Sunday, March 30, 2014
Iceland Dismantles the Corrupt - Then Arrests Ten Rothschild Bankers
Submitted by ronb28135 on Fri, 03/28/2014 - 15:49
in Hidden Knowledge
"The truth of the matter is… No one, except the Icelanders, have to been the only culture on the planet to carry out this successfully. Not only have they been successful, at overthrowing the corrupt Gov’t, they’ve drafted a Constitution, that will stop this from happening ever again.
"That’s not the best part… The best part, is that they have arrested ALL Rothschild/Rockefeller banking puppets, responsible for the Country’s economic Chaos and meltdown. Last week 9 people were arrested in London and Reykjavik for their possible responsibility for Iceland’s financial collapse in 2008, a deep crisis which developed into an unprecedented public reaction that is changing the country’s direction..."
"...Pressure from Icelandic citizens’ has managed not only to bring down a government, but also begin the drafting of a new constitution (in process) and is seeking to put in jail those bankers responsible for the financial crisis in the country."
"Sigurdur Einarsson, former chairman of the defunct Icelandic bank Kaupthing, was arrested in London at 5:30 this morning along with the bank’s biggest customer, Robert Tchenguiz, and five others in a joint operation by the UK Serious Fraud Office (SFO) and the Office of the Special Prosecutor in Iceland."
Intellectual Property in a World Without Scarcity
Mark A. Lemley
Stanford Law School
March 24, 2014
Things are valuable because they are scarce. The more abundant they become, they cheaper they become. But a series of technological changes is underway that promises to end scarcity as we know it for a wide variety of goods. The Internet is the most obvious example, because the change there is furthest along. The Internet has reduced the cost of production and distribution of informational content effectively to zero. In many cases it has also dramatically reduced the cost of producing that content. And it has changed the way in which information is distributed, separating the creators of content from the distributors.
More recently, new technologies promise to do for a variety of physical goods and even services what the Internet has already done for information. 3D printers can manufacture physical goods based on any digital design. Synthetic biology has automated the manufacture not just of copies of existing genetic sequences but any custom-made gene sequence, allowing anyone who want to create a gene sequence of their own to upload the sequence to a company that will “print” it using the basic building blocks of genetics. And advances in robotics offer the prospect that many of the services humans now provide can be provided free of charge by general-purpose machines that can be programmed to perform a variety of complex functions. While none of these technologies are nearly as far along as the Internet, they share two essential characteristics with the Internet: they radically reduce the cost of production and distribution of things, and they separate the informational content of those things (the design) from their manufacture. Combine these four developments – the Internet, 3D printing, robotics, and synthetic biology – and it is entirely plausible to envision a not-too-distant world in which most things that people want can be downloaded and created on site for very little money.
The role of IP in such a world is both controverted and critically important. IP rights are designed to artificially replicate scarcity where it would not otherwise exist. In its simplest form, IP law takes public goods that would otherwise be available to all and artificially restricts their distribution. It makes ideas scarce, because then we can bring them into the economy and charge for them, and economics knows how to deal with scarce things. So on one view – the classical view of IP law – a world in which all the value resides in information is a world in which we need IP everywhere, controlling rights over everything, or no one will get paid to create. That has been the response of IP law to the Internet so far.
But that response is problematic for a couple of reasons. First, it doesn’t seem to be working. By disaggregating creation, production, and distribution, the Internet democratized access to content. Copyright owners have been unable to stop a flood of piracy with 50,000 lawsuits, a host of new and increasingly draconian laws, and a well-funded public education campaign that starts in elementary school. Second, even if we could use IP to rein in all this low-cost production and distribution of stuff, we may not want to. The point of IP has always been, not to raise prices and reduce consumption for its own sake, but to encourage people to create things when they otherwise wouldn’t. More and more evidence casts doubt on the link between IP and creation, however. Empirical evidence suggests that offering money may actually stifle rather than drive creativity among individuals. Economic evidence suggests that quite often it is competition, not the lure of monopoly, that drives corporate innovation. The Internet may have spawned unprecedented piracy, but it has also given rise to the creation of more works of all types than ever before in history, often by multiple orders of magnitude.
Far from necessitating more IP protection, then, the development of cost-reducing technologies may actually weaken the case for IP. If people are intrinsically motivated to create, as they seem to be, the easier it is to create and distribute content, the more content is likely to be available even in the absence of IP. And if the point of IP is to encourage either the creation or the distribution of that content, cost-reducing technologies may actually mean we have less, not more, need for IP.
IP rights are a form of government regulation of market entry and market prices. We regulated all sorts of industries in the 20th century, from airlines to trucking to telephones to electric power, often because we couldn’t conceive of how the industry could survive without the government preventing entry by competitors. Towards the end of that century, however, we experimented with deregulation, and it turned out that the market could provide many of those services better in the absence of government regulation. The same thing may turn out to be true of IP regulation in the 21st century. We didn’t get rid of all regulation by any means, and we won’t get rid of all IP. But we came to understand that the free market, not government control over entry, is the right default position in the absence of a persuasive justification for limiting that market. The elimination of scarcity will put substantial pressure on the law to do the same with IP.
A world without scarcity requires a major rethinking of economics, much as the decline of the agrarian economy did in the 19th century. How will our economy function in a world in which most of the things we produce are cheap or free? We have lived with scarcity for so long that it is hard even to begin to think about the transition to a post-scarcity economy. IP has allowed us to cling to scarcity as an organizing principle in a world that no longer demands it. But it will no more prevent the transition than agricultural price supports kept us all farmers. We need a post-scarcity economics, one that accepts rather than resists the new opportunities technology will offer us. Developing that economics is the great task of the 21st century.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 55
There is something to be said about the heart. It is your most powerful organ. Once it stops, so do you in this realm. So it functions as a motor; beating out a daily rhythm to the life you are living.
It is more than that. It has a role as the guide, the conductor of virtually every other facet of life. The energy supplied by the heart does more than pump blood through veins and arteries. It supplies feeling and infuses life with purpose. You are more than a physical machine. You are a biochemical love producer.
As the amount of love cannot be measured or weighed or even seen, how can it be known? What is its purpose in the overall plan for life? It can be felt and it is here that it alters everything else.
The climate and environment in which all human organs swim and live can be altered by emotion. Stress, hatred and sadness have a harsh effect on a biochemical level. Love creates the opposite reaction. The emotion of love supports health and increases longevity when all other factors are operating normally. It is an elixir of youth.
I speak here of the love that is felt through your body, generating an effect that actually shifts the chemical balance within.
None of this probably matters to you on a day to day basis. Love just feels good. It’s what we are all searching for. It’s what propels us forward and sets a kind of equilibrium for the rest of your days.
What is the rest, if not love? For love is a part of every action and interaction. Each moment holds within it a possibility to love and to both give and receive the blessing it offers. You can pump gas with love, make breakfast with love, answer the phone with love and pay your bills with love. Love does not exist for some and not others. This includes moments as well as people. There is always more love.
If you see a place that appears devoid of love then you are witnessing the effect of confusion. It is possible to alter circumstances in such a way that they appear hopeless and hateful. It is not possible to remove love from the situations. Guns, anger and fear are powerful techniques to hide the love that is present. Yet they do not have the ability to eradicate it.
Fear is the opposite of love. It is present when confusion shows up and truth is not remembered. It cannot force out the fact of love, although it can appear that way.
It may seem pointless to consider loving when you are hurting, possibly sick or in less than perfect physical circumstances. Yet nothing would aid the situation more than love. It is magic when understood.
How each idea and moment is approached can determine its outcome. Love looks like a smile, joy, confidence and hope. Love sees truth and colors it with patience. There is a moment today when you will have the opportunity to either love or be afraid. Love, because fear is a fruitless enterprise.
Your life is limited only by your ideas about it. You can see it as cold or view it as warm and with possibility. It is difficult to speak of love and not include the opinion that to love is very much dependent on circumstances and luck.
It is your choices that determine your life, and included in them is the choice to love. Say “yes” to love and do it despite all opposition. Loving anyway creates a field of positive energy around you and every part of your days. Love your cat, your mail carrier, your banker and your ex. Love in each moment and the effect will be exponential. You’ll find a string of days filled with promise and know a deep peace that does not exist when fear and “no” instead predominate.
The amazing thing is this. Say “yes” for you – not because it’s the right thing but because it’s like swimming upstream with the current – easier and faster without struggle. Say “yes” because of how good it feels for you.
Then watch the world around you change. Everything becomes crystal clear through lenses of acceptance. Through eyes of love your world unifies. It becomes One. What feels good for you, feels good for everyone else.
You are the One you’ve been waiting for.