TIMELESS COMMENTS ON TIMELINES: Head Scratching Over the Daniel Papers
by GW Hardin
As a New York Times bestselling author, I often get to see a lot of things others don’t. Because of that I feel the need to bring in additional material to the “Daniel” papers. Reading the Daniel papers is like the trying to drink water from a fire hose. So I will limit my comments in this first response in the name of sanity as well as brevity. Depending on the reaction to this balancing act with Daniel, I may provide follow-up white papers.
In brief, I will address three areas of partial imbalance in the Daniel papers:
1. Humanity as Sons of Slaves or Sons of God ... based on his comments in his paper on “The Uncommitted Investigator.”
2. The Return to Timeline Zero (the “natural” timeline) as Opposed to the Ascension into Timeline Three ... based on his writings in “Time and Timelines.”
3. “The Cavalry is Coming” Versus the David-and-Goliath Complex.
On several occasions I’ve been asked to ghostwrite or co-write books regarding ETs, celestials (usually angels), and EDs (extra-dimensionals) because of my reputation for being able to write and describe the indescribable as well as being dedicated to the truth of the story, whether that is a relative truth or what some describe as “absolute truth.” In my years of investigating the material I present to the public, one of the most mind blowing involved the Philadelphia Experiment, or what Daniel addresses as “the Montauk Project.” I decided not to write a book on the secrets of the Philadelphia Experiment, that have never fully been presented to the world, for the very same reasons that Daniel decided not to write about Montauk and timelines until now: no one was willing to believe it.
Humanity as Sons of Slaves or Sons of God
Let’s get one thing straight from the beginning, the term “Sons of God” is a complete mistranslation in Scripture. The actual Hebrew term is “bene Elohim,” or Sons of the Elohim. The fact that Jews believe the Elohim to be God is inconsequential to me. Let’s just stick to the translation. The reason I say that, if I may steal a quote from the movie Poltergeist, is “They’re back.” I have been associated with at least two appearances of these beings from three different people in the Colorado area. And the information coming from them has cleared up a lot of misunderstanding about the Elohim’s role as the creator beings of humankind.
For starters, the bene Elohim (or Sons of God during the time of giants, Gen. 6: 2-4) were what Alexander Sitchin called the Annunaki. As tempting as it is to go down that rabbit hole, I’d rather move on by stating that the Annunaki were not the only creation of the Elohim. There was another very dynamic group, called humans. In the Nag Hammadi Library of gnostic works lies a hidden story of what happened to these two creations of the Elohim (the real story of the Archons). The soundbite bottom line is that the Annunaki were jealous of the gifts given to humanity (Christ Consciousness), and decided to enslave their brothers by dummying down their DNA. One can choose a number of myths that follow from that (whether fallen angels or Atlantis or the Archons), for there is a modicum of truth in them all. However, there is one point I’d like to make regarding my research on the geometry of DNA: “You can take the boy out of the country but you can’t take the country out of the boy.” Geometrically, the same can be said for DNA (see my article on the DNA tesseract on American Kabuki (here).
In the tesseract article (“A Celestial Mystery Solved”), I point out how human DNA is multi-dimensional, which means you can alter it in one dimension but it still holds its “naturalness” in higher fractals that access higher dimensions. Daniel makes a similar point in his reference to “Timeline Zero”: